Movies have a way of demonstrating past stories. Whether or not films make fun of certain events, they shine a light on global connections. Django Unchained does just that. The movie Django Unchained highlights global connections by changing the perspective and exaggerations in certain scenes. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay Django Unchained was released on December 25, 2012, and grossed $425.4 million at the box office. The film won several awards, such as the Academy Awards, NAACP, BET and many others, for its portrayal of a spaghetti western from the perspective of a slave. Django Unchained takes place in 1858, two years before the Civil War. This film tells the story of a slave, Django (Jamie Foxx), who finds himself accompanying a bounty hunter named Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz). Dr. Schultz buys Django in order to find and capture the Brittle brothers. Django and Dr. Schultz make a deal that once Django helps find the Brittle Brothers, he will be released. After the mission, Dr. Schultz releases Django as per their agreement when Schultz purchased him. Once he frees Django and learns how Django will reunite with his wife, Dr. Schultz proposes that they team up for the winter to hunt the most wanted criminals and collect the bounty. During the winter, Django has a taste for being a bounty hunter because he kills white men, his oppressors. After winter, Django and Dr. Schultz go on a mission to find Django's wife, Broomhilda (Kerry Washington), who is still a slave on Calvin Candie's (Leonardo DiCaprio) plantation. Dr. Schultz and Django create a plan to enter Candieland, find Broomhilda and escape before being caught by Calvin Candie. This doesn't go as planned, but eventually everything works out for Django and Broomhilda riding away from the burning main house of Candieland. Django Unchained is about revenge in the sense that the oppressed finally have victory over their oppressor. The film changes the perspective that most films have not delved into. Django Unchained is from the perspective of an enslaved black man. Most films based on this period of the Civil War do not feature a black man as the hero. It is usually a white man who is the main character. The main character is generally reserved for white people, which constitutes the hegemonic code. The hegemonic code refers to particular ideologies regarding race and gender. This is where the public can recognize and receive ideologies as normative and familiar (Satchel, p. 88). Movies have followed this code for as long as movies started being made. Minorities, when they participate in films, are generally secondary and subordinate to the white hero. Historically, films with a white hero earn more because they attract audiences. The film Django Unchained changes this notion and proves that it is more profitable to invest in non-hegemonic storylines that change the perspectives of minorities (Satchel, p. 88). In the movie Django Unchained, the main character is a black man who is played by a black man. Some films have a minority character played by a white individual. “For the moment, however, we must consider the nature of value independently of its form of appearance” (Marx, p. 128). This film demonstrates that value is not based on appearance, but on quality. Django Unchained proves that even though there are different appearances where a hero is a white individual or a minority, there can be a similar quality that appeals to audiences. Django Unchainedchanges the idea that a white individual must play the main character for a film to generate good profits. With Django - a black slave - as the main character, the film changes the perspective of the story. The movie, Django Unchained, tells the story. Even though the film does not accurately depict slavery, it rewrites history so that the film is no longer seen by a white man. The story is told from the perspective of a black man, although it was written by a white man, Quentin Tarantino. Django Unchained's take on a black slave adds a new element to the story. History no longer belongs to the white man, it also belongs to a diversity of people. In Eric Wolf's introduction to Europe and the Peoples Without History, he states that history is transformed "into a moral achievement, a race through time in which each runner passes the torch of freedom to the next relay ". This suggests that the story is about the “good guys” beating the “bad guys.” This then turns the story into a morally oriented narrative, without any indication of the various social and cultural processes at work in their time and place. Wolf uses the example of class conflict in ancient Greek cities and the relationship between free men and their slaves to suggest that history as a moral narrative does not allow us to see the social processes of the time. We would not ask the questions in which the story turns into a moral success story. Django Unchained highlights the social and cultural processes of the time period in which it takes place. With this, the film brings out a new element of the story through a different lens that other films from the same period sometimes fail to do. Eric Wolf says the story is made up of multiple points of view. If we don't see these multiple perspectives, we lose sight of the connections between people, societies, cultures and countries. This film illustrates another side of the story. It shows the escape from slavery and the paranoia of slave owners. With this escape and paranoia, came violence. The different sides of the story show the violence of slavery and the importance of slavery in the local and global economy. For example, in the film there is a scene early on where a line of six slaves were walking barefoot in chains through Texas on their way to be sold. They were chained like dogs with the belief that they are not people. The film also shows other forms of violence. Another example is a scene where Django and Dr. Schultz enter Spencer "Big Daddy" Bennett's plantation in Tennessee. There were small fragments of many slaves working on the immense acreage of cotton. From a white man's perspective, the only thing shown are the cotton fields without slaves working them. If the film was from a white man's point of view, Django Unchained would not show or only highlight the injustices and violence towards slaves. With the change in perspective to a black slave, it presents the narrative of the story in a different light. When it comes to telling the story of Django Unchained, the film depicts how globalization has had social consequences. Slavery played an important role in stimulating the local and global economy, which strengthened social structures. Michel Rolph Trouillot observes that “the academic, political and industrial leaders of most countries in the world are telling citizens that they can do nothing about the social consequences of globalization”. Django Unchained describes this clearly through dialogue. In the entire film, the word is used more than 110 times. This exaggeration of the use of the n-worddemonstrates the social consequences. These consequences in the film suggest that slavery created a name that grouped people without identity. With clips of cotton fields and the slaves who worked them, the film illustrates that slavery was not just a point in US/world history or the economy. Django Unchained brings slavery to the forefront. That doesn't hide it. In Sven Beckert's "Cotton and the Global Origins of Capitalism," he argues that "North Atlantic elites began to tell new stories about themselves, stories in which slavery had little of place” in economic growth. Slavery actually played a larger role in capitalism. As Beckert argues, we should see slavery being an important part of the global economy, the film Django Unchained also suggests that the history of slavery needs to be part of the conversation about capitalism. Since slavery is the main theme of the film, Django Unchained, it illustrates other forms of economics. at the local level. In Sven Beckert's "Slavery's Capitalism," he suggests that "the domestic slave trade was home to some of the crudest entrepreneurship of the 19th century and helped transform slavery into something more than 'a labor system: a property regime in which wealth could be stored, transferred, exploited, secured and bequeathed by black men, women and children held under legal title'. This means that slaves are property, which means that ownership equals power. The more slaves you own, the more power you have in politics, society and the economy. “The Baptists offered 'torture' as the most appropriate explanation for the new efficiency of field work. The violence of the whip, both in the field and at the weighing, pushed the workers to ever greater feats of picking.” Sven Beckert suggests that slave owners used violence to make slaves work faster so that they, the owners, would receive more wealth from the amount of cotton ready to be sold. Not only does the number of slaves one own mean more power, but it also means that the more slaves one owns, the more labor output one has. This in turn gives them more wealth. Because slave owners could do virtually anything to their slaves, they allowed overseers to use whatever force was necessary to ensure the cotton quota was met. If slaves did not do the right thing, regardless of their role on the plantation, they were punished so that it would set an example of what happens when something wrong is done. The scene where Django is taken to the Brittle brothers on Spencer "Big Daddy" Benet's plantation, he sees two of the brothers about to whip a slave girl for breaking a few eggs. The brothers used this slave as an example to show others what would happen to those who do evil. Since slaves were considered property, owners could do almost anything with slaves. In the film, there are particular scenes that demonstrate this. When Candie discovers that Django and Dr. Schultz have defrauded him, he catches Broomhilda, telling her that she is his property and can do whatever he wants with her. And at that moment he hits Broomhilda with a hammer. In another scene, a slave escaped because he didn't want to fight anymore, so Candie ordered the dogs to attack. Calvin Candie calmed the situation, but this only kept the slave from hiding and ultimately led to his disappearance. Candie does not allow the slave not to be punished because this.