Short essayIn matters of ethics and law, there are controversial aspects describing the fundamental elements that an individual must take into account when medical decision-making. Under the Canadian legal system, adults who understand the consequences of their medical choice have the ability to refuse any medical treatment they want, even if it could save their life. It is the idea that an individual is independent. Canadian common law recognizes that an individual has the right to control their body. Tortious battery, which is when unwanted physical interference takes place without one's permission, has consistently protected bodily safety. Doctors frequently ask themselves whether minors benefit from these rights. Much deliberation has taken place around the question of whether children have the capacity to consent or refuse medical procedures despite the parent's objection or approval. The extent to which children must make such decisions varies across countries around the world, Canada being one of them. Canadian law has achieved fundamental principles emphasizing that the decision-making capacity in which an adolescent develops is not strictly associated with the age of the individual. but more about the maturity one possesses. In 2009, a case took place, AC v. Manitoba, which concerned a fourteen-year-old girl hospitalized for Crohn's disease. She was a Jehovah's Witness and had signed an advance medical directive stating that she would not receive any blood transfusions under any circumstances. Her condition was very serious and without a blood transfusion she would die. For this reason, a judge granted a treatment order and she therefore received a blood transfusion in accordance with the middle of the document......this seems to be the most promising solution to promote the perseverance of common resources. . The solution to the tragedy of the commons mentioned by Garret Hardin being the creation of a common pool of resources in the form of private property will not be as promising as the solution proposed by Justice Douglas by creating a common pool of resources in the form of legal persons. Many of the concepts discussed can be used to preserve and regulate nature, such as concepts of ownership as well as concepts of legal personhood. It is fundamental to believe that nature tends to play an important role in the lives of individuals, even if it may not seem like it. This conclusion results from the numerous cases which revolve around this element. Although solutions to preserve common resources have been discussed, the question will always be who or what concept will become dominant in this area..