The world speaks the same language, that's the title of my report. I think what happens if we all speak the same language? what could happen if they spoke the same language? what could change if we spoke the same language? , why don't we speak the same language? , I think if they want to answer this question, what is the answer and what happened, why Allah makes us speak another language, in this report I want to explain what is useful if they speak the same language and what is a mistake if they speak another language? , and why humans kill people because they speak another language. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay A world that speaks the same language: See what happened when all the people in the world spoke the same language, or why all the people in the world didn't speak the same language? , and what we can do to ensure that everyone in the world speaks the same language. There are approximately 7.5 billion people on the third rock after the Sun. That's 7,500,000,000 individual names, 15,000,000,000 years and 150,000,000,000 phalanges (give or take a few hundred... million?). The Earth is 148,326,000 square kilometers above sea level and is divided into 7 continents housing 196 different countries. These 196 countries, with their 7.5 billion inhabitants, use around 7,000 languages. Around 6% of these languages ​​represent the mother tongue of 94% of the population – 50% of the languages ​​are spoken by fewer than 10,000 people and 25% are spoken. by less than 1,000 people. Given the great complexity of human life spread across the globe, we are actually quite united linguistically. But as we move forward into the 21st century, are we getting closer to linguistic solidarity? What would happen if all humans understood a single language? According to the Bible, this has already happened. Long ago, after the Great Flood, humanity was united under a single, common language. Apparently, this led to a huge gain in productivity, the result of which must have been so magnificent that God Himself intervened: “And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered over the face of the whole earth. » But the LORD came down to see the city and the tower that the sons of men had built. And the LORD said: “For the people are one and they all have one language, and this they begin to do; now, nothing they propose to do will be refused to them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they do not understand each other's language. » From there the Lord scattered them over all the face of the earth. , and they stopped building the city. Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the LORD confounded the language of all the earth, and from there the LORD scattered them over the face of all the earth. » And according to the Koran. an Allah said "(O people, we have created you from a man and a woman and made you peoples and tribes so that you may know that your honor with God Ikakm that God knows the expert(13) Surat Al-KharatThe people of the tribe of the tribes are also wicked and Adnan, while the tribe is the divisions of the people, and some of them said: The people who belong to the land, while the tribe is attributed to their origin. Others said: The people are non-Arab tribes this division, which begins with the unit of the family then extends to the thigh and the abdomen up. to reach the architecture and the tribethen the people, was not in vain, but for the purpose of knowledge. Without getting caught up on God's reason, it is clear that this story hints at the possibilities that open up. The moment when dialect will never again be a border if communication: today's man will perhaps not need to manufacture. A giant, flood-proof tower, Be that a space elevator may not be crazy about the address. Perfects of the same dialect view this thought as claiming united human collaboration. Without this, the main thing will not be to make these fillings more difficult. Anyway, so this should redefine padding and extra entry, right?. It is predicted that by 2100, more than half of the more than 7,000 dialects spoken on Earth could cease to exist. Alongside these dialects an exceptional history, culture, perspective and personality map will disappear. There will certainly be a price to pay for a more globalized social order. However, even if these dialects disappear, their numbers will not disappear. A late survey estimated that in time, Tom's reading of 2100 on the global figure could reach as high as 12.3 billion - an increase of 64% over the century. Know that while affirming that this parent will have a dialect with speaking if you stop offering this one that now exists, alternatively it may be a new optional language and groove designed for what is to come worldwide, subject to the world. As stated by this Guardian, about a particular case study conducted by teacher James Foreman-Peck of the Branch for Business of the United Kingdom, additionally improves skills and weak dialect skills to pamper this saving £48 billion ($75.6 billion) per year, or 3.5% of GDP. This inability to communicate holistically is particularly detrimental to small and medium-sized exporters who are constantly managing these semantic masters that larger organizations use. A different insight from the UK's trade claim chambers helps Foreman-Peck's research, revealing that 62% of non-exporters Exporting organizations looking for universal opportunities saw dialects. As an illustration, a notable restriction at the same time, 70% of exporters did not require any foreign language capabilities in the countries in which they work. For example, in the United States, last year's GDP could have been $17.41 billion. Based on the fact that those who discovered that poor language skills manage 3.5% of GDP on average, this means that we have wasted around 600 billion dollars. over the period for 2014 only. Wow. This is a considerable measure compared to claiming the money. In fact, that's exactly the same amount of money our government uses for its military every year: 16% of the national plan. You stop proposing a huge investigation into how a basic dialect might influence our differences as a species. Language may not be the best way we express ourselves, but it also influences the way we see the world. Economist Keith Chen reflected on how future contrasts influenced how the speaker thought about what was to come. He discovered that dialects with a fragile future were tense, it's just the tip of the iceberg, responsible for something like organizing what's to come — they consume less, smoke less, also fill all the more with crazy. An example statement of how Camwood tense future differs: On Mandara, you might say "I'm trying out some movies this weekend"(weak future tense) while in English you might say "I'm going to try out some movies this weekend" (as the Atlantic said, alongside an article regarding Chen's article, "He asked if dialects with low future times could have a chance to be more attentive to what will result, they think, grammatically, equal to the exposure ". eBay arrangements made. A rather interesting feature summarizing the newspaper: those which appear on the. sequence By stating of course, no one knows if people imagine this because of their language, or if their dialect may be essentially this way because it reflects how individuals imagine Regardless, the article. of Chen reveals that this dialect will be deeply linked to the way people perceive the world, which becomes dependent on this inquiry -Assuming we all speak the same language, could we let go of the differences and start to think? see this planet in the same way? Romanian scholar Emil Cioran once said: “When I transformed my language, I demolished my secret word. I transformed my entire aggregation. » this New York Times article expands on this idea by saying: "For a writer's language, far from being continually an unimportant method of expression will be above all a mode of claiming subjective presence and an approach to encountering the world. She doesn't need dialect to describe things, but to see them. The world is revealed in a certain way by the Japanese writer, and more than one of you stops proposing who composed it in the end. A writer's dialect is not exactly something he uses, but a constituent dialect and only what it is. Maybe this is why you should abandon your local language and groove. You should also adopt an additional one, perhaps you will take yourself apart, little eventually, Tom's reading piece, et cetera, put you back together, unhooked alongside another guy. ". This article goes ahead to say: "To begin with, in evolving dialects, you slide towards a zero point of your presence. There has to be a chance of being a meaningful moment, however brief, where you stop. "It's a bit dramatic, because there is a percentage of truth previously there. Once we start speaking, the dialect gains a major perspective on who we are. It's how we identify ourselves to this world, and this is also how we were ready to fill the gaps and make civilizations It is a huge and unique our overall personality and our distinctive identity, which also needs a powerful impact on our. way of thinking. As we learn another language, we lose the secure place in our local dialect. Recently, I could have been taken down alongside Ecuador thanks to the crew. terrible. Also, when speaking to someone who needs equally terrible English, I realized that conveying broken speech takes away from me and only who I am. I can't joke. or express complex considerations I am not insensitive to advanced motives. I say things like, "I'm trying to shop right away." " My personal is usually absent from this discussion. Something that we underestimate - the fundamental correspondence - ends up creating nervousness, embarrassment, and also takes away the certainty that is An and only who we are. transmitting a broken speech, I removed everything that makes me, me The correspondence is directed towards a single reason And nothing, all the more Of course, the immense address is constantly directed towards: of which dialect. could it be?English, Chinese or Spanish, or another language? Assuming Tom ends up reading Occam's Razor, English will be a pretty safe guess. Chinese dialects are undoubtedly the common majority, they would rarely speak about China outside anyway (except possibly the expats who travel Tom). English can be spoken all over the world, it is also used as a basic dialect in many fields - science as well. technology, global relations (this is an authoritative dialect of the umpteenth EU), aeronautics and the navy, and of course, the American popular society which achieves a lot. Also wide, highly appreciated should Hollywood. Yet, as the dialect is attached, the culture, English hails for a rich history, and any individual who adopts it. Concerning the illustration A dialect begins with an adhesion to this society. It's quite likely that many people would be safe with this - they wouldn't need to be forced into a distant culture. And who could blame them? Considering the history of England and American imperialism, there is need for help from many individuals across the world who might think that English is also our only dialect is just one type alternative of pretending to force society around others who have nothing to do with it. English must be said if a chance to be notoriously harsh will get a result, it can be overflowing with spellings, strange pronunciation, and also many of people's idioms. While English may not be the ideal world language, it could become a special case primarily due to pragmatism - individuals in Mossycup Oak force the impulse to adopt a second dialect. The odds that come with speaking English, despite its difficulties, currently outweigh a significant number of other decisions. That we cannot choose around which dialect "wins" (and for hell's sake could probably solidify thanks to what we did previously), an additional choice will be to create another language, intended to be spoken to the whole world, free from any single society or personality map. A secure assistant dialect could enable many of the benefits of widespread speech without those passing as a social personality also being a legacy. Such a dialect exists. Esperanto is an international dialect built in 1887. Esperanto could have been designed to be easy to learn and politically non-partisan, making it a perfect prospect for an auxiliary dialect. Esperanto currently needs 100,000 to 2,000,000 familiar speakers and around 1,000 local speakers (that's in fact on Google Translate!). Although Esperanto does not need to be like wildfire, it must develop relentlessly. Assuming anything, it will be a vision of the future. What's more, it supports the model of global unification. If it is difficult for the people of the world to speak in a unified language, are people coming together to use a single body language for physical exchanges? expression in question without recourse to verbal language? Answer: No. For example, the tag “admiration” on Facebook, widely distributed around the world, has different connotations. Just as it expresses "admiration" and "it's going well", the same sign expresses bad and degrading connotations if used in countries like Italy, Russia, Australia, Greece, the Philippines, l West Africa and Iraq. The discrepancy in the indications of this reference is that the American soldiers during their invasion of Iraq were Iraqis who brandished this mark at them, and at first thought that the.