The reasons why Mark wrote are catechetical teaching; liturgical use in religious services; to cover up Jesus' failure to proclaim himself Messiah; soften the political offensive towards the Roman authorities; and finally, encourage persecuted Christians to understand that Jesus also suffered and died. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayGiving new converts catechetical instruction as a reason for writing the Gospel of Mark - does not hold up because Mark did not give much of Jesus' teaching in his gospel. The outline and discussion of our text say a lot, but teaching is not suggested throughout the book. Therefore, it is clearer that Marc was more informative than instructive. Regarding the Gospel of Mark written for liturgical use in religious services. This comes from the word liturgy meaning a form of public worship; ritual. There are difficulties of arrangement regarding the style, smoothness, and symmetry of Mark that do not support a liturgical document. Another objection I have is that many writings were not the standard for teaching during the second century because the religion was regularly practiced in synagogues and temples, so a written gospel was not probably wasn't what they were using. Jesus did not boast. However, those who think that Mark is writing to cover up his inability to proclaim himself Messiah are mistaken. Jesus said, “I have not come to judge the world, but to save the world” KJV John 12:47. It was not something he kept secret, however, his miraculous prowess was not hidden, nor was it something he seemed to be ashamed of. There seems to be an explanation for this in that He did not want to be overwhelmed by the press of people who would want to approach Him to have similar miracles happen to them. The attenuation of the political offensive was due to the "messianic secrecy" cited by some who believed that Mark was writing to conceal Jesus and was not proclaiming himself as the Messiah. This is unlikely, because people knew about Jesus through other accounts of what was already orally preached at the time. The political sensation at the time was Hellenistic and Rome really didn't care one way or the other about Jesus, so there would have been no need to reduce the political stressors regarding Jesus. Encouraging persecuted Christians is another possible reason for writing the Gospel of Mark. This is a double-edged sword because at the time, believing in Christ could cost you your life, so it is understandable that such a view could be entertained. However, I oppose it because the people who believed in Christ already knew the risks to their faithfulness. Furthermore, the apostles preached much of what Jesus had experienced in a monotonous manner and added that they would also likely suffer a similar fate, so such an explanation in written form would not have been necessary. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized paper. now from our expert writers.Get a Custom Essay I believe the reason for the Book of Mark is as stated in 2 Tim 3:16: “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correct, for instruction in righteousness: "Some have also written that the Gospel of Mark was a transcription of what Peter was an eyewitness, who was told "John Mark" to tell us what Peter saw of Jesus so that we believe.