Table of ContentsIntroductionBody ParagraphAdvantages of Roper v. SimmonsDisadvantages of Roper v. SimmonsConclusionIntroductionThe Landmark Case Roper v. Simmons Simmons (2005) is of significant importance in the United States legal system, particularly regarding juvenile justice. The United States Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on people who were under 18 at the time of the crimes. This decision was based on the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The decision has sparked substantial debate, with its supporters saying it is a step toward a more humane justice system and its opponents saying it weakens accountability for serious crimes. This essay aims to explore the pros and cons of the Roper v. Simmons, providing a balanced analysis of its implications on the legal landscape and society. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original EssayBody ParagraphBenefits of Roper c. SimmonsOne of the main advantages of the Roper v. Simmons's alignment with psychological and neuroscientific research on adolescent development. Studies indicate that young people have underdeveloped brains, particularly in areas related to impulse control, risk assessment and moral reasoning. Recognizing these developmental differences, the Court recognized that juveniles are less culpable than adults for their actions. By eliminating the death penalty for juveniles, the decision reflects a more scientific and compassionate approach to juvenile justice. Additionally, the decision aligns the United States with international human rights standards. Before Roper v. Simmons, the United States was one of the few countries to allow the execution of juvenile offenders. The move brought U.S. practices more in line with global standards, thereby improving the country's reputation in the international community. This alignment is significant, given the emphasis on human rights in international law and the moral leadership role the United States often aspires to on the global stage. Another important advantage is the potential for rehabilitation. Minors have a greater capacity for change and rehabilitation than adults. By removing the death penalty as a sentencing option, the justice system can focus on rehabilitative measures aimed at reintegrating juvenile offenders into society. This change can lead to more positive long-term outcomes both for the individuals involved and for society as a whole. Disadvantages of the Roper v. Simmons Despite its advantages, the Roper v. Simmons is not without his critics. One of the main concerns is the potential for reduced deterrence. Opponents argue that the threat of the death penalty serves as a deterrent against heinous crimes. By removing this ultimate sanction, there are concerns that juveniles will not be sufficiently deterred from committing serious offenses, which could lead to an increase in violent crimes committed by juveniles. Another criticism concerns the perceived lack of accountability. For victims' families, the death penalty can represent a form of justice and closure. Eliminating this sentencing option for juveniles can be considered a failure as young offenders are fully responsible for their actions. This perspective is rooted in the belief that some crimes are so serious that they..