Rudyard Kipling's short story "On the City Walls" presents an extremely complex aspect of British rule over India in the 19th century. The setting is Lahore where a courtesan named Lalun holds a salon in her apartment on the city wall. If you want to know what is happening in the city, Lalun's apartment is the central point of data and discussions. mostly Wali Dad, a local Mohammedan with an English education, and the narrator The story is told as it appears to the narrator, with holes and gaps filled in later as he discovers more. information. Say No to Plagiarism Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned” Get. knowing that it will never be fully recognized in the English world as an equivalent. The hatred is shared by Khem Singh, an old Sikh who was. detained for escalation against the English armed forces, but was recently granted probation in Lahore. Singh's hatred is unique, as he finds that the younger generations prefer to cooperate with the Raj rather than fight for their opportunity. Many images show the India of yesteryear compared to the current setting: the "red tombs of dead emperors beyond the waterway" with the cricket ground. along the river, and the dynamic Khem Singh against a latent Wali Dad (although both eventually surrender to their individual disappointments) to conjure up two clear sets. Regardless, what does Kipling (or the storyteller) think of the royal situation? I feel an unpredictable abdication of the conquest of the heart. He detects nobility and respect for India's past, while recognizing the benefits of the English running the show. Kipling clearly paints the captain in the most unflattering light, but soon after points out the potential powder keg of religious difficulties that the officers effectively mediate. the current situation is far from what he might wish to see, I have the impression that he considers that the absence of the British would be much more disastrous. I thought it was intriguing that two distinctive local characters remarked on the stupidity of the benevolence shown by the English. The actors' options seem to be a choice between illusion and futility. Wali Dad cannot change his identity: he will never be fully recognized in English society or trusted by his comrades. He rejected everything, caught up in a temporary religious fervor which made him betray Singh's traitors. Khem Singh considers his alternative options, one which cannot be completed while the other is brimming with disappointment. The main character who seems satisfied with the story is Lalun, and his basic goal. Whereas, as in “shooting an elephant,” Orwell uses the elephant as a representation of his involvement in the institution of colonialism. He writes that the experience with the elephant allowed him to know "the true motivations for which despotic governments act." Killing the elephant while it is slowly eating grass is undoubtedly a display of savagery – one that symbolizes the barbarity of expansionism in general. The elephant's insubordination does not legitimize Orwell's decision to kill. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Or perhaps his frenzy is a consequence of an existence spent in slavery - Orwell clarifies that "the.”