blog




  • Essay / Fundamental elements of the patient-doctor relationship

    Fundamental elements of the patient-doctor relationshipHere are some values ​​of the medical profession:1. Beneficence: Doctors should do well. They should try to heal others and improve the situation considerably;2. Non-misbehavior: Doctors should do no harm. They must practice their treatment carefully and honestly and, when beneficence is unthinkable, they must still attempt to minimize injury. Restrictions on premature births and killings undoubtedly stem from this concern;3. Honor: Doctors must act decently. They must approach their patients with deference and must not maintain questionable relationships with them; and4. Confidentiality: Doctors must ensure the trust of their patients and not disclose information unnecessarily. Patient rights Notwithstanding the obligations of specialists, we can also consider the privileges of patients. The American Medical Association has proposed accompanying patient rights:1. The patient has the right to obtain data about his or her condition, including both a determination and a guess. The patient also has the right to discuss different medications with the specialist, including cost/benefit dissection;2. The patient has the right to make choices based on their own awareness of their health. The patient also has the right to refuse any medication;3. The patient has the right to cordiality, respect and timely consideration regarding his or her needs;4. The patient has the right to confidentiality;5. The patient has the right to congruence of social insurance; and6. The patient has the right to benefit from sufficient social insurance. The doctor-patient relationship can be described as follows:1. Paternalism, I...... middle of paper ......ht to select the approach that provides the greatest benefit to the patient. It is conceivable that there could be a strategy that healthy people could choose, and Brock imagines that the surrogate mother should choose it. Then again, sane individuals may differ on the types of drugs they might like, given that they have distinct qualities and inclination structures. Therefore, finding the best investment is probably tricky, which is why we would like to solve the problem with one of the first two methodologies. References Childress, JF and Siegler, M. (1984). Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: their implications for autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 5(1), 17-30.Buchanan, AE and Brock, DW Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision-making. 1989. Cambridge Univ Pr.51, New York.